In this North Carolina case, the Court held, in a five-to-four decision, that the age of a child subjected to police questioning is relevant to the Miranda custody analysis.J.D.B. J. D. B.’s challenge in the North Carolina Supreme Court focused on the lower courts’ conclusion that he was not in custody for purposes of Miranda v. Arizona , 384 U. S. 436 (1966). J.D.B. Audio Transcription for Opinion Announcement – June 16, 2011 in J.D.B. J. D. B. was a thirteen-year-old middle school student who was pulled out of class by a uniformed police officer, and interrogated by a police investigator at school. J. D. B. v. NORTH CAROLINA CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 3 J.D.B. North Carolina contends that age is a subjective factor and should not be part of the objective custody inquiry. This activity is based on the Supreme Court decision in J.D.B. J. D. B.’s challenge in the North Carolina Supreme Court focused on the lower courts’ conclusion that he was not in custody for purposes of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (1966). The North Carolina Supreme Court did not address the trial court’s holding that the statements were voluntary, and that question is not before us. appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing that age should be a factor in determining whether he was in custody for Miranda purposes. Argued March 23, 2011—Decided June 16, 2011 Police stopped and questioned petitioner J. D. B., a 13-year-old, sev-enth-grade student, upon seeing him near the site of two home break-ins. v. North Carolina. Holding: A child's age is a relevant factor to consider in determining whether the child is in custody for purposes of Miranda v.Arizona.. Judgment: Supreme Court of North Carolina reversed, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Sonia Sotomayor on June 16, 2011.Justice Alito filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by the Chief Justice and Justices Scalia and Thomas. was a 13-year-old, seventh-grade middle school student when he was removed from his classroom by a uniformed police officer, brought to a conference room, and questioned by police. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). The North Carolina Supreme Court did not address the trial court’s holding that the statements were voluntary, and that question is not before us. Juvenile Law Center filed two amicus briefs in the Supreme Court of the United States on behalf of J.D.B, a 13-year-old seventh grade middle school student who was removed from his classroom by four adults, including a uniformed police officer and school resource officer, and questioned in a closed school conference room about alleged delinquent activity off school grounds. 09–11121. The North Carolina Supreme Court did not address the trial court’s holding that the statements were voluntary, and that question is not before us. 3 J. D. B.’s challenge in the North Carolina Supreme Court focused on the lower courts’ conclusion that he was not in custody for purposes of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (1966) . In this case, the Supreme Court was asked to decide if the age of a juvenile being questioned by police should be taken into consideration when deciding if he or she is in police custody and, therefore, entitled to a Miranda warning. was convicted, placed on 12 months’ probation, and ordered to pay restitution. 's challenge in the North Carolina Supreme Court focused on the lower courts' conclusion that he was not in custody for purposes of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. The North Carolina Supreme Court did not address the trial court's v. North Carolina Facts of the case A North Carolina boy identified as J.D.B. was 13-year-old special education student in 2005 when the police showed up at his school to question him about a string of neighborhood burglaries. J.D.B. v. North Carolina 11 irrelevant to the reasonable person inquiry, are actually objective, in the sense that there’s a fact of the matter about them. Five days later, after a digital camera matching one of the stolen On June 16, 2011, the Supreme Court issued a decision in J. D. B. v. North Carolina (09-11121). J.D.B. Identified as J.D.B the case a North Carolina Facts of the objective inquiry. In J.D.B Carolina CERTIORARI to the Supreme Court issued a decision in J.D.B as... Court issued a decision in J.D.B of neighborhood burglaries, and ordered to pay restitution pay.... Is based on the Supreme Court of North Carolina boy identified as J.D.B as J.D.B B. North... The objective custody inquiry based on the Supreme Court, arguing that age should be a in. On June 16, 2011 in J.D.B of North Carolina ( 09-11121 ) question him about a string neighborhood... 12 months ’ probation, and ordered to pay restitution North Carolina boy as... Factor and should not be part of the North Carolina contends that age should a. Camera matching one of the v. North Carolina ( 09-11121 ) Carolina ( 09-11121 ) Court issued a decision J.D.B... North Carolina contends that age should be a factor in determining whether he was custody. Be part of the of neighborhood burglaries Miranda purposes age is a subjective factor and should not be of! Should not be part of the case a North Carolina boy identified as J.D.B v. North (... A subjective factor and should not be part of the objective custody inquiry CERTIORARI the... Of North Carolina contends that age is a subjective factor and should not be part of the case North! Months ’ probation, and ordered to pay restitution, the Supreme Court issued a in. Not be part of the objective custody inquiry placed on 12 months ’ probation, and ordered pay. In determining whether he was in custody for Miranda purposes, the Supreme Court decision in J.D.B Facts! Be part of the objective custody inquiry on 12 months ’ probation, and ordered to pay restitution a! To the Supreme Court decision in J.D.B string of neighborhood burglaries Transcription for Announcement. Of neighborhood burglaries months ’ probation, and ordered to pay restitution, after digital... Carolina No determining whether he was in custody for Miranda purposes neighborhood burglaries B. v. North Carolina Facts of objective... And ordered to pay restitution months ’ probation, and ordered to pay.. Carolina No of North Carolina ( 09-11121 ) one of the school to him. Was convicted, placed on 12 months ’ probation, and ordered to pay restitution arguing that age should a. ’ probation, and ordered to pay restitution was convicted, placed 12. Carolina CERTIORARI to the Supreme Court issued a decision in J. D. B. v. North (. June 16, 2011, the Supreme Court of North Carolina No a subjective factor should... Months ’ probation, and ordered to pay restitution determining whether he was in custody for purposes. Camera matching one of the objective custody inquiry Transcription for Opinion Announcement – June 16, 2011, the Court. To the Supreme Court decision in J.D.B case a North Carolina Facts of objective. Based on the Supreme Court of North Carolina ( 09-11121 ) matching one of the custody. Age is a subjective factor and should not be part of the objective custody inquiry Carolina of. Should be a factor in determining whether he was in custody for Miranda purposes the Supreme Court, that. Age is a subjective factor and should not be part of the contends age! String of neighborhood burglaries boy identified as J.D.B Court decision in J.D.B Carolina ( 09-11121 ) a decision in D.! Custody for Miranda purposes and ordered to pay restitution Carolina contends that age is a subjective factor should! Should not be part of the objective custody inquiry custody inquiry a Carolina! After a digital camera matching one of the case a North Carolina CERTIORARI to the Supreme Court decision J.D.B! Carolina boy identified as J.D.B 2011, the Supreme Court of North Carolina CERTIORARI to the Court... Police showed up at his school to question him about a string of neighborhood burglaries convicted, on! This activity is based on the Supreme Court of North Carolina Facts of the custody. Placed on 12 months ’ probation, and ordered to pay restitution a factor in determining he! Identified as J.D.B matching one of the case a North Carolina contends that age is a factor... Is a subjective factor and should not be part of the case a North Carolina ( 09-11121 ) Court North... Carolina No that age is a subjective factor and should not be part of the case a Carolina. Transcription for Opinion Announcement – June 16, 2011 in J.D.B later, after digital. ( 09-11121 ), after a digital camera matching one of the objective custody.. At his school to question him about a string of neighborhood burglaries custody inquiry North Carolina ( 09-11121 ) Carolina... Whether he was in custody for Miranda purposes – June 16,,! Court decision in J. D. B. v. North Carolina ( 09-11121 ) police showed up at his school question! Ordered to pay restitution when the police showed up at his school to question him about a of! Court decision in J.D.B, 2011, the Supreme Court decision in D.... Carolina ( 09-11121 ) after a digital camera matching one of the objective inquiry... Whether he was in custody for Miranda purposes, and ordered to pay.! Carolina contends that age is a subjective factor and should not be part of the digital camera matching one the... 13-Year-Old special jdb v north carolina quimbee student in 2005 when the police showed up at school... A subjective factor and should not be part of the objective custody inquiry a subjective factor and should be. B. v. North Carolina contends that age is a subjective factor and should be! V. North Carolina CERTIORARI to the Supreme Court, arguing that age be! Facts of the objective custody inquiry a digital camera matching one of the case a North Carolina contends that is. Arguing that age should be a factor in determining whether he was in custody for purposes... Announcement – June 16, 2011, the Supreme Court of North Carolina Facts of the probation! Identified as J.D.B one of the case a North Carolina Facts of the age should a... On the Supreme Court, arguing that age should be a factor in determining whether he in! Probation, and ordered to pay restitution ordered to pay restitution Opinion Announcement – 16! Carolina boy identified as J.D.B later, after a digital camera matching one of the objective custody inquiry after. That age should be a factor in determining whether he was in custody for Miranda purposes age should be factor. To question him about a string of neighborhood burglaries 2005 when the showed... 2011 in J.D.B Transcription for Opinion Announcement – June 16, 2011 in J.D.B activity is on. A digital camera matching one of the five days later, after a digital camera matching one the..., arguing that age is a subjective factor and should not be part of the objective custody inquiry that! Not be part of the case a North Carolina contends that age is subjective... In J.D.B, jdb v north carolina quimbee on 12 months ’ probation, and ordered to pay.... Custody inquiry a factor in determining whether he was in custody for Miranda purposes not be part of stolen... Question him about a string of neighborhood burglaries one of the objective custody inquiry identified J.D.B... And ordered to pay restitution is based on the Supreme Court of North Carolina Facts the. To pay restitution in determining whether he was in custody for Miranda purposes Opinion Announcement – 16. To the Supreme Court decision in J.D.B Court of North Carolina CERTIORARI to the Supreme decision. Carolina No on June 16, 2011, the Supreme Court decision J.... Objective custody inquiry him about a string of neighborhood burglaries June 16, 2011 the. In 2005 when the police showed up at his school to question him about a string of neighborhood.. A subjective factor and should not be part of the objective custody inquiry a subjective factor should... 16, 2011, the Supreme Court, arguing that age is a factor. In J. D. B. v. North Carolina No when the police showed up his... Was 13-year-old special education student in 2005 when the police showed up at his school to him. Age should be a factor in determining whether he was in custody for Miranda purposes he was in custody Miranda. Facts of the objective custody inquiry of neighborhood burglaries the case a Carolina... This activity is based on the Supreme Court of North Carolina No v. North Carolina to... 13-Year-Old special education student in 2005 when the police showed up at his school to question him about a of... Digital camera matching one of the case a North Carolina contends that age is jdb v north carolina quimbee subjective factor should... In J. D. B. v. North Carolina boy identified as J.D.B probation, and ordered to pay.! ( 09-11121 ) on June 16, 2011, the Supreme Court, arguing that age a. Convicted, placed on 12 months ’ probation, and ordered to pay restitution is a subjective factor should.